Friday, December 8, 2006

Conspiracy Theorists Debating.

I made a post at at Loose Change forums, unfortunately I won't link to it, because I'm using a proxy to access the website and I don't want to give away my ID (thus getting banned...for the 4th time). This post was a 'debunk' of the Norman Minetta testimony regarding the shoot down order. Since there was no real CTers answers to this, I got two interesting replies. The first two replies with REAL truthers agreeing with the 'debunk' of his statement, a few later were good examples of debating:

Denial. It aint just a river in Egypt.
Check this out, for starters.
9/11 The Myth and the Reality: Dr. David Ray Griffin
- Arrowhead
The post links to the video of David Ray G. Ok, you might want me to see this video, but to post it in a thread regarding Norman Minetta? Way to change the subject.

Debating tactic number two: USE HUGE CAPITALS LETTERS AND CHANGE THE SUBJECT:

Show me the references to Atta, Hanjour, Al Shehi or Jarah contacting ATC on 9/11 and identifying themselves as the pilots.

This aspect of the official story is an assumption.


Where is your critical analysis of this myth?
- Bad Machine

I still can't apologize enough for being associated with that crew.

No comments: