"I was thinking of compiling a list that shows just how contradictory the 9/11 conspiracy is. Everything in the list should be something that is supported by 9/11 CTists."
#. Conspiracy claim.
Contradiction/Inconsistency/Contradicting CTer claim
1. A missile hit the Pentagon. Light poles were plucked out of the ground close to the Pentagon.
For these two statements to be true: Prior to striking the Pentagon, the missile pinballed off 5 different light poles without detonating.
2. A missile hit the Pentagon. There was a small amount of airplane debris found on the yard of the Pentagon.
For these two statements to be true: milliseconds after the Pentagon was struck, lightning-quick, possibly invisible gnomes ran around the yard and dispersed random chunks of airplane wreckage.
3. Damning evidence of there being charges inside the towers is the numerous reports of explosions.
Inconsistency: no such claim is made about WTC 7.
4. NORAD stood down and didn't intercept any of the hijacked jets.
"Flight 93 was shot down."
5. NORAD stood down.
"NORAD had numerous test missions scheduled for that day."
6. The towers fell neatly within their own footprints.
The south tower ejected just enough material to minorly damage WTC7 and justify it's controlled demolition.
7. Damning evidence of there being charges inside the towers is the numerous reports of explosions. Thermite/ate reactions were used to weaken the steel beams, as confirmed by Steven Jones.
Thermite/ate is not an explosive and does not sound like one.
8. Rumsfeld/Willie Brown/Pentagon officials stopped flying commercially before 9/11
Surely Rumsfeld would know which flights were sceduled to be hijacked and would not book a ticket on them. They would know no flights out of San Francisco were part of the operation.
9. The janitor in the basement of the WTC reported explosions (attributed to a bomb) in the basement of the building.
The buildings were destroyed top-down; why bother planting 'extra' explosives that would not have been needed to bring down the towers?
10. 9/11 enabled the US to invade Afghanistan so they could build a pipeline. Al Qaeda and the Taliban are puppets of the CIA/ISI.
Why do you need to invade land that is totally controlled by your puppets?
5 comments:
You have some decent counter-points for most of the 10 statements. However, for you to assume that Flight 93 was shot down would be stretching the line of non-evidential "fact" and blind assumption. The pictures of the wreckage of Flight 93 show no signs of an airplane existing in that location, little alone being "shot down by NORAD". There is no blood or body parts, no seats, no large pieces of aircraft, no luggage, just a big hole in the ground. Your many assumptions of debunking "truthers'"theories only fuels YOUR theories. They do not answer serious questions posed by many people. Rhetorically speaking, who in their right mind would think that falling debris from the Twin Towers would bring down a steal building the same way the towers fell but with no airplane or jet fuel to "weaken tower 7's steal supports?" Your counter-points that September 11th went down the way the government said it did had no grounds to stand on, because there is no data to back your claim. There is only predetermined notion and assumptions that were spoon-fed to you by the media and the government. You say there were no claims made about bombs inhibiting WTC 7 is true because the 9/11 Commission Report failed to mention that anything about building 7 at all. Granted, their are many outlandish theories posed by consiracy "nuts" who think that everything isn't what it seems. However, there are many more questions out there that remain unanswered. (Why did the CIA and FBI wait so long to release the convenient store video tape outside the Pentagon?) Being that there is so many inconsistencies in the government sanctioned 9/11 report and many questioned still left un asnwered, one must assume that the government is not telling the whole truth in the manner of the events of September 11th.
95% of Flight 93 was recovered.
Well lets just say that the experts agree that the falling debris from WTC1+2 combined with the fires raging inside WTC& brought it down. The initial NIST report doesn't think it was a CD - what are over 200 scientists getting wrong?
With the pentagon...
You'll notice that videos are only ever released when a trail for a terror suspect is on. Why is that? Because the tapes are criminal evidence. The FBI don't have to release them to satisfy trivial conspiracy theorists needs.
Please please please post a question that hasn't already been answer/debunked a million times by JREF, logic or experts in the field.
Post a Comment