Nothing to say!
No new ''''''''''''evidence'''''''''''' has emerged, no whistleblowers, nothing.
Maybe we'll all wait until LC:FC is out.
If it ever does.
Monday, March 19, 2007
Thursday, March 8, 2007
9/11 Conspiracy: Contradictions 1-10
From JREF.
#. Conspiracy claim.
Contradiction/Inconsistency/Contradicting CTer claim
1. A missile hit the Pentagon. Light poles were plucked out of the ground close to the Pentagon.
For these two statements to be true: Prior to striking the Pentagon, the missile pinballed off 5 different light poles without detonating.
2. A missile hit the Pentagon. There was a small amount of airplane debris found on the yard of the Pentagon.
For these two statements to be true: milliseconds after the Pentagon was struck, lightning-quick, possibly invisible gnomes ran around the yard and dispersed random chunks of airplane wreckage.
3. Damning evidence of there being charges inside the towers is the numerous reports of explosions.
Inconsistency: no such claim is made about WTC 7.
4. NORAD stood down and didn't intercept any of the hijacked jets.
"Flight 93 was shot down."
5. NORAD stood down.
"NORAD had numerous test missions scheduled for that day."
6. The towers fell neatly within their own footprints.
The south tower ejected just enough material to minorly damage WTC7 and justify it's controlled demolition.
7. Damning evidence of there being charges inside the towers is the numerous reports of explosions. Thermite/ate reactions were used to weaken the steel beams, as confirmed by Steven Jones.
Thermite/ate is not an explosive and does not sound like one.
8. Rumsfeld/Willie Brown/Pentagon officials stopped flying commercially before 9/11
Surely Rumsfeld would know which flights were sceduled to be hijacked and would not book a ticket on them. They would know no flights out of San Francisco were part of the operation.
9. The janitor in the basement of the WTC reported explosions (attributed to a bomb) in the basement of the building.
The buildings were destroyed top-down; why bother planting 'extra' explosives that would not have been needed to bring down the towers?
10. 9/11 enabled the US to invade Afghanistan so they could build a pipeline. Al Qaeda and the Taliban are puppets of the CIA/ISI.
Why do you need to invade land that is totally controlled by your puppets?
"I was thinking of compiling a list that shows just how contradictory the 9/11 conspiracy is. Everything in the list should be something that is supported by 9/11 CTists."
#. Conspiracy claim.
Contradiction/Inconsistency/Contradicting CTer claim
1. A missile hit the Pentagon. Light poles were plucked out of the ground close to the Pentagon.
For these two statements to be true: Prior to striking the Pentagon, the missile pinballed off 5 different light poles without detonating.
2. A missile hit the Pentagon. There was a small amount of airplane debris found on the yard of the Pentagon.
For these two statements to be true: milliseconds after the Pentagon was struck, lightning-quick, possibly invisible gnomes ran around the yard and dispersed random chunks of airplane wreckage.
3. Damning evidence of there being charges inside the towers is the numerous reports of explosions.
Inconsistency: no such claim is made about WTC 7.
4. NORAD stood down and didn't intercept any of the hijacked jets.
"Flight 93 was shot down."
5. NORAD stood down.
"NORAD had numerous test missions scheduled for that day."
6. The towers fell neatly within their own footprints.
The south tower ejected just enough material to minorly damage WTC7 and justify it's controlled demolition.
7. Damning evidence of there being charges inside the towers is the numerous reports of explosions. Thermite/ate reactions were used to weaken the steel beams, as confirmed by Steven Jones.
Thermite/ate is not an explosive and does not sound like one.
8. Rumsfeld/Willie Brown/Pentagon officials stopped flying commercially before 9/11
Surely Rumsfeld would know which flights were sceduled to be hijacked and would not book a ticket on them. They would know no flights out of San Francisco were part of the operation.
9. The janitor in the basement of the WTC reported explosions (attributed to a bomb) in the basement of the building.
The buildings were destroyed top-down; why bother planting 'extra' explosives that would not have been needed to bring down the towers?
10. 9/11 enabled the US to invade Afghanistan so they could build a pipeline. Al Qaeda and the Taliban are puppets of the CIA/ISI.
Why do you need to invade land that is totally controlled by your puppets?
Friday, March 2, 2007
Witnesses
If there is one thing I have learned from films and Prison Break, it would be that witnesses of a conspiracy would have to be killed in order to keep the story secret.
So my question is: why haven't the witnesses that heard explosions, or didn't properly see a plane near the pentagon been killed?
So my question is: why haven't the witnesses that heard explosions, or didn't properly see a plane near the pentagon been killed?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)